Students' Attitudes towards Active Participation in Lectures as Influenced by Instructional Factors in Teacher Education Programmes
A Comparative study of Selected Public and Private Universities in Nakuru County, Kenya.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58216/kjri.v6i1.122Keywords:
Attitude, Participation, Lectures and instruction based factorsAbstract
Students’ attitude towards active participation in lectures in teacher education programmes has become a major concern to education managers in higher education circles as well as parents and quality agents. This research study seeks to address the emotive twin problem of non-attendance of lectures and dormancy during lectures on the part of student teachers. In this study, the two problems are referred to as lack of active participation in lectures in teacher education programmes. The objective of this study was to determine students’ attitude towards active participating in lectures in teacher education programmes in selected universities in Nakuru County, Kenya.This study was based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance for attitude change propounded by Festinger Leon (1957). The researcher conducted a critical review of literature related to students’ attitude towards participating in lectures. This research study adopted the descriptive survey research design. After piloting, the instrument was validated.Using the split half method and Spearman- Brown Correction formulae, the questionnaire scored a reliability coefficient of 0.7 and was accepted as reliable in line with the threshold recommended by Fraenkel and Wallen (2000).Data was collected from a study population of 310 fourth year bachelor of education students in6 Private and Public Chartered universities offering teacher education programs in Nakuru County, Kenya. The sample size was 257. The researcher employed stratified, purposive and simple random sampling techniques. Data from students’ questionnaires were coded and analyzed using tools in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. Frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations were computed. One- way Analysis of Variance, Post Hoc Test and T-tests were carried out to measure significant differences between means of samples.The study found out that students’ attitude towards active participation in lectures was more positive   in private universities (M = 2.60, SD = 0.41) than (M = 2.46, SD = 0.45) of public universities. The results further indicate that the difference between the two means was statistically significant, t (225) = 2.413, p=.017) at 0.05 alpha. This study therefore established that students enrolled in teacher education programmes in private universities have more positive attitudes towards active participation in lectures compared to their counterparts in public universities.The results of this study could be used by Commission for UniversityEducation and universities in Kenya to shape students’ attitude towards active participation in lecturesin teacher education programmes. The study recommends the need for further research on how quality of instructional activities  can be improved with a view to inculcating in students a positive attitude towards active participation in lectures in these universities.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. Y., Abu Bakar, N. R., &Mahbob, M. H. (2012). Student’s participation in classroom: What motivates them to speak up? procedia-Social and Behavioural sciences , 520-522.
Amitava, R., &Majundra, G. (2010). Factors affecting Students’ Academic Perfomance: A case Study in Agartala Municipal Concial Area. Bangladesh E-Journal of Sociology, Vol. 7(2).
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at the University. Buckingham. Open University Press
Bunoti, S. (2010).The Quality of Higher Education in developing Countries Needs Professional Support.www.intconfhighered.org.
Butt, H.I., & Shams, A. J. (2013). Master in Education Students Attitude Towards Research: A Comparison between two Public Sector Universities in Punjab: A Research Journal in South Asia Studies, Vol.28 (1), pp: 97-105.
Chandran, R. (2015). Mandatory class participation: Factors that influence, classroom practices and learning outcomes. Asian Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5 (2), 108-122.
Clause, C. (2015).Content Validity: Definition Index and Examples.http://www.education-portal.com/academy/lesson/content-validity-definition-index-examples.html
Clay, T., &Breslow, L. (2005). Why Students’ Don’t Attend Classes. Teach talk.Vol. 18(4).
Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (2007).Research Methods in Education.Routledge Publishers comprehensive Guidance and Counseling programs in Nova Scotia.In professional School Counseling, 59(4), p. 292-297.
Commission for Higher Education (2008). Handbook on the Processes for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Kenya.Commission for University Education.
Commission for University Education. (2014). Universities Authorized to Operate in Kenya. www.cue.or.ke.
Deming, W.E. (1986). Economic Pressure and the Professor.In, American college; a psychological and social interpretation of higher learning.New York John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Festinger, L.(1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fraenkel, J.R. &Wallen, N.E. (2000).How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Gross, R. (2001). Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Hashmi, K. (2013). Introduction & implementation of Total Quality Management TQM. Retrieved November 16, 2016, from htt[://www.isixga.com
Hitchens, M., & Lister, R. (2007).A Focus Group Study on Student Attitude Towards Lectures. crpit.com.
Iqbal, H. M. (2010). Prospective Teachers Attitude towards Research, Unpublished masters Thesis, Institute of Education and Research, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Johnson, B., & Chistensen. (2012). Educational Resource:Qualitative &Quantitative and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Wshington DC: Sage.
Kelly, G. E. (2012). Lecture attendance rates at university and related. Journal offurther and higher education , 35.
Kerlinger, F. (1999).Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York:Wadsworth Publishing.
Kottasz, R. (2005). Reasons for Student Non-Attendance at Lectures and Tutorials: an analysis. Investigations in university teaching and learning , 13.
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970).Determining the Sample Size for Research Activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Lopper, J. (2006). What is Attitude? http://suite101.com
Massingham, P., & Herrington, T. (2006). Does attendance matter? An examination of student Attitudes, participation, performance and attendance.Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 3 (2), 96.
Michael, H. & Raymond, L. (2009).A Focus group Study of Students’ Attitude to Lectures. Conferences and Research and Practice in Information Technology, Volume 95. Australian Computing society, Inc.
Ministry of Education.(2012). A Policy Framework for Education and Training.Government of Kenya.
Mugenda, A.G. (2008) Social Science Research: Theory and Principles. Nairobi: Acts Press,.
Nakuru County Development Profile.(2013).First County Integrated Development Plan. Nakuru: Government printer.
Namunga, N. W., &Otunga, R. N. (2012). Teacher Education As A driver For Sustainable Development In Kenya. International Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 (5), 1.
Okwakol, M.J.N. (2009). The Need for Transformative Strategic Planning in Universities in Uganda.NCHE Journal Kampala.
Trochim, W. M. (2006). Survey Research. Retrieved November 18, 2016, from Research Methods Knowledge Base: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net
