An Evaluation of the Coping Strategies of Medical Residents in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58216/kjri.v12i2.222Keywords:
coping strategies, medical residents, mental health.Abstract
Coping has been demonstrated as the critical determinant of mental health among medical residents. No study has quantitatively evaluated the coping strategies of medical residents in Kenya. This study, therefore, sought to assess the coping strategies of medical residents in Kenya. The BRIEF Cope was used. The study was a quantitative, cross-sectional online survey among medical residents in Kenya. The validated study tool consisted of the Brief-COPE. Stratified sampling technique was used with a sample size of 283 calculated. Descriptive statistics were analyzed into proportions. Adaptive coping strategies were more utilized. The most commonly used adaptive coping strategies were acceptance (mean 69.96, SD 22.41), planning (mean 69.15, SD 22.84), positive reframing (mean 67.81, SD 22.42), and religion (mean 62.40, SD 26.96). The most commonly used maladaptive coping strategies were self-distraction (mean 61.33, SD 21.38), venting (mean 55.04, SD 19.25) and self-blame (mean 52.52, SD 21.82). Adaptive coping strategies were used more than maladaptive ones. The most commonly used adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies were acceptance and self-distraction respectively. Policy formulation to promote utilization of adaptive coping strategies among medical residents in Kenya.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Kabarak Journal of Research and Innovation (KJRI) provides immediate open access to all its published content. This is in line with our commitment to making research freely available to the public, supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
Readers are free to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.