Role of the Courts in Ensuring Free and Fair Elections in Kenya

A Tale of Fifty-Six Years of Legal Sophistry and Intellectual Dishonesty

Authors

  • Muthomi Thiankolu University of Nairobi, School of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58216/kjle.v4i1.175

Keywords:

free and fair elections, Kenya, judiciary, Fifty-Six Years

Abstract

Although the Judiciary has made many decisions that are consistent with the ideal of free and fair elections in the last fifty-six years, its dominant approach to electoral dispute resolution generally entails making superficially sound but disingenuous and deeply flawed decisions. This ‘clever’ approach, referred to as ‘legal sophistry’ in this article, generally entails an inflexible emphasis of legal and procedural technicalities; eschewing or suppressing serious genuine questions regarding the validity and integrity of elections; disingenuous adoption of discreditable case law from countries that practice pseudo or sham democracy; and manipulation of the law in favour of incumbency. Legal sophistry is inconsistent with the transformative agenda of the 2010 Constitution, which, inter alia, requires the Judiciary to promote the values and principles embodied in the Constitution and determine (electoral) disputes without undue regard to technicalities of law and procedure. Legal sophistry undermines the ideal of free and fair elections in at least three significant ways. First, it encourages electoral fraud and malpractice. Secondly, it leads to absurd or unjust outcomes, such as judicial affirmation of flawed elections. Lastly, legal sophistry undermines democracy, the rule of law and public confidence in the courts as honest arbiters of political disputes. The entrenchment of legal sophistry as the Judiciary’s dominant approach to electoral dispute resolution has defied constitutional, legal and institutional reforms specifically designed to end it. The resilience of legal sophistry may be attributed to the factors that have influenced the evolution of the Judiciary from its inception to date, especially colonial legacy, corruption, patronage politics, impunity and the institutional degradation of the pre-2010 years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Muthomi Thiankolu , University of Nairobi, School of Law

Muthomi Thiankolu, University of Nairobi, School of Law

Muthomi Thiankolu is a Partner at Muthomi & Karanja Advocates and a Lecturer at the University of Nairobi School of Law. His research and practice interests are in dispute resolution, constitutional and administrative law, public procurement regulation and international economic law. Muthomi holds an LLM in International Economic Law (with distinction) from the University of Warwick; an LLB (Hons.) from the University of Nairobi and a Postgraduate Diploma from the Kenya School of Law.

Published

2021-11-14

How to Cite

Thiankolu , M. (2021). Role of the Courts in Ensuring Free and Fair Elections in Kenya : A Tale of Fifty-Six Years of Legal Sophistry and Intellectual Dishonesty. Kabarak Journal of Law and Ethics, 4(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.58216/kjle.v4i1.175

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.